PREFACE
The third volume of the history of
the Corps of Signals is really the first, the previous two volumes covering the
history of the Indian Signal Corps, the name by which the Corps was known
before Independence .
In fact, when Brigadier T. Barreto wrote the draft manuscript of Volume I,
which covered the period from 1911 to 1939, the title of book was ‘History of
the Indian Signal Corps’. However, between the time he completed the draft in
1965 and its publication in 1975, the title had been changed to the ‘History of
the Corps of Signals’. Even when the second volume covering the period 1939 to
1947 was being compiled, this anomaly was pointed out by Brigadier Barreto
during my frequent interaction with him. However, in order to avoid confusion
in the minds of the reader, it was decided to continue with title ‘Corps of
Signals’ instead of ‘Indian Signal Corps’ in Volume II also.
Ideally, work on Volume III should
have commenced immediately after the publication of Volume II in 2006. However,
it was only in mid 2007 that the decision was taken to go ahead with the
project. Compared to the interval of over thirty years between the publication
of the previous two volumes, this delay may appear to be of little consequence.
But the gap resulted in some additional delay because the Corps History Cell
that had been functioning for the last five years was wound up in 2006. The
manpower and equipment had been redistributed to units, and the reference
material returned to Jabalpur ,
Mhow etc. Consequently, it was only towards the end of 2007 that the cell was
established and work started in earnest on the project.
The present volume covers the first
25 years of the post Independence
history of the Corps, from 1947 to 1972. This includes all the major wars
fought by the Indian Army after Independence
viz. the Jammu & Kashmir operations of 1947-48; and the Indo Pak wars of
1965 and 1971. It also covers the Hyderabad
operation of 1948, the Goa operation in 1961,
the skirmish at Nathu La in Sikkim
1967 and various operations undertaken under the aegis of the United Nations.
Apart from the performance of the Corps in operations, other aspects such as
organisations, personnel, training, equipment, developments in signal
communications and regimental institutions have also been covered.
Since the records of the Sino-Indian conflict of
1962 have still not been declassified, the chapter dealing with these
operations does not form part of this Volume. It is intended to print it
separately as a supplement, which can be added to the book at a future date,
when records are declassified. Similarly, due to security considerations, some personal
inputs from veterans
who
took part in the Nathula and Chola skirmishes in 1967 and the Indo-Pak war of
1971 in the Eastern Theatre have been curtailed or omitted.
In the chapters dealing with
operations, a brief account of the battles and actions has been given followed
by the role and performance of Signals. Instances of failure of signal
communications have also been highlighted along with the achievements and
successes. A few veterans expressed the view that failures in signal
communications should not be mentioned, as this tarnishes the image of the
Corps. However, the majority of
signallers do not support this view. History must record events truthfully;
otherwise it ceases to be classified as history. In fact, this attitude has
been the bane of Indian military history, after Independence. Several war
diaries and regimental histories of the post Independence period mention only successes,
glossing over failures, even though these are mentioned in after action reports
of formations of which they formed part
and in accounts written by those who
participated in the operations. This probably stems from a false sense of
‘izzat’ which has been inculcated in some regiments and units. Though not completely immune from this
syndrome, the Corps of Signals is afflicted to a lesser degree than others. The
few instances of failure of signal communications mentioned in this volume have
been taken from declassified records such as war diaries of the period
preceding 1962, unit histories or accounts of the officers who took part in the
operations.
The major problem encountered in compilation of the
present volume was the lack of reference material. For the portions dealing
with operations, the principal source is the war diary, supplemented by
personal accounts and unit histories. The History Division of the Ministry of
Defence located in RK Puram has a large number of war diaries, which can be
perused by scholars. The History Division has also compiled official histories
of all major wars and operations since Independence. However, only the one
pertaining to the period up to 1961 have been published in printed form. The
official histories of the wars in 1962, 1965 and 1971 have still not been
declassified or printed, though they are available on the Internet. They can be
accessed by scholars and used for research, but cannot be used in official
publications, which need clearance from Army HQ or the Ministry of Defence.
A considerable amount of material was obtained from
the Corps Museum and the archives that form part of the library in MCTE. However,
there were large gaps, which could not be filled. Sadly, the after action reports compiled by
each signal unit after the 1971 war could not be traced in the Signals
Directorate, the respective command headquarters or the MCTE, each of whom were
sent a copy. By a stroke of good luck, the reports pertaining to Eastern Command
were found in the Corps
Museum by an officer of
the Corps History Cell during his visit to Jabalpur . But the reports pertaining to
Western Command could not be located.
An important document that gives information on all
matters concerning the Corps is the Corps Planning Note, which later became the
Liaison Note. In the early years it was issued every month by Signals
Directorate but the frequency was later made bi-monthly and then quarterly.
Every major signal unit gets a copy, in addition to all headquarters and
establishments. The Liaison Notes No. 1 to 40 for the period 1947 to 1956 were
found in the material collected earlier for compilation the Corps history by
Brigadier Barreto. However, subsequent issues could not be located for quite
some time. Again, by a stroke of good luck, Liaison Notes for the period 1963
to 1972 were found in 2 STC very recently. However, the Liaison Notes for the
period 1957-62 could not be located, in spite of sustained efforts. This has
resulted in some gaps in the chapters dealing with organisations, personnel,
training, equipment and developments in signal communications. In October 1971
instructions were issued to destroy old copies. With this, a valuable source of
reference material was lost, forever.
As mentioned
in the Preface of the previous volume, the frequent movement of the records
between Delhi , Jabalpur and Mhow during
the last 40 years, necessitated by the change in responsibility for compilation
of the Corps History has aggravated the situation. The requirement for a
permanent Corps Archives, which has been highlighted earlier, still exists.
Exactly fifty years ago, Brigadier Barreto proposed that Signals should have a
regimental headquarters on the lines of other Arms and Services and the Royal
Signals in UK .
For some reason, the proposal was not accepted, though Brigadier Barreto
continued to raise it in every subsequent meeting of the Corps Committee until
he retired in 1965. Perhaps the time has come to reconsider the suggestion,
which will also give a permanent address to the Corps Association, which today
exists only on paper. It should be
manned by a full time Secretary of the Corps Committee, who could also look
after the Corps Museum and Archives. If a suitable
veteran agrees to perform this role, he could also become the Corps Historian.
In addition, a suitable officer could be posted in Signals Directorate as the
Corps Monographer, an appointment that existed up to 1954.
A large number of veteran signallers who served in
the Corps during the period covered by this volume were contacted, thorough
e-mail, telephone and by post. Many of them gave very useful inputs, in the
form of anecdotes and personal experiences. Some have also given photographs
and their personal diaries. These have been acknowledged in the text or in the
endnotes. As each chapter was completed, it was sent to selected veterans for
their comments. This was made possible by the availability of Internet,
obviating the necessity of making large numbers of copies on a typewriter. The
‘Report My Signals’ site was frequently used for the purpose of clarifying
doubts and filling gaps. We are indebted to Brigadier C.S. Kamboj who was ever
willing to circulate our queries. Many
among the large number of veterans on his mailing list responded with comments
and clarifications, which were very useful.
It is difficult to list all the sources from which
material was collected or acknowledge the contribution of every signaller –
there were just too many. However, among the few who spent a lot of time going
over drafts and giving suggestions were Major General K.K. Tewari, Brigadier
P.S. Gill, Lieutenant General M.S. Sodhi, Lieutenant General S.L. Mehrotra, Lieutenant
General Harbhajan Singh and Lieutenant General Prakash Gokarn. Most helpful
were the personal diaries of General Tewari and Colonel N.C. Gupta, and the
personal accounts of Brigadier Lakshman Singh, Brigadier Shamsher Singh, Brigadier
P.K. Ghosh and many others. In fact, General Harbhajan Singh had written the
complete history of the Corps during the Indo-Pak War of 1965, which has been
extensively used in Chapter 5.
As always, the role of guide and mentor was
performed by Brigadier Tery Barreto, our first Corps Historian. In spite of his
age – he recently celebrated his 92nd Birthday – and failing vision,
he diligently read the draft of each chapter, returning it with his comments
and suggestions. In fact, his personal records collected assiduously until the
day he retired were the most valuable source material, especially for the chapter
on Regimental Institutions. As is well known, he played an important role in
setting up and nurturing several important Corps institutions such as the Corps
Museum, War Memorial, Regimental Colours, Corps Flag, Headquarters Mess, Roll
of Honour, Honours and Awards list and many others. However, his outstanding
achievement is the compilation of the Corps History. His esprit-de-corps was
aptly summed up in the article in the Signalman after his retirement, which
stated: “He loved the Corps as few others did…..
To Tery, the Corps was everything”.
Credit for initiating the project must go to
Lieutenant General S.P.S. Kumar, the Signal Officer-in-Chief, who ensured that
the History Cell was set up in 2007 with commendable speed and provided the
necessary administrative backing. His successor, Lieutenant General P.
Mohapatra, nurtured and oversaw the project for more than two years, removing
difficulties and providing whatever assistance was needed. The next two heads
of the Corps - Lieutenant Generals SPS Kochhar and Nitin Kohli, have done their
bit in getting the manuscript approved by DGMI and DGMO. Their personal
involvement played an important role in the fruition of the project.
I would also like to place on record the support
provided by the Directorate General of Signals, Commandant Amy HQ Signals and
CO 1 Army HQ Signal Regiment, in whose premises the Corps History Cell was
located. A large number of documents
used in compilation of the present volume were made available by the Military
College of Telecommunications (MCTE), Mhow; No.1 Signal Training Centre,
Signals Records and the Corps Museum, Jabalpur; and No. 2 Signal Training
Centre, Goa. I am grateful to the Commandants of MCTE and the both STCs for
their unstinted support.
Thanks are also due to Mrs. R. Dhanedar and her
staff of the History Division of the Ministry of Defence, who were ever ready
to help us in searching for reference material such as war diaries and unit
histories. We would also like to thank Colonel B.D. Maitra of the Photo Division
of the Directorate of Public Relations and Shri Sahid Anwar of the Sainik
Samachar, who gave us copies of photographs held in their collection.
In the end, I must thank the members of the Corps
History Cell without whose assistance the project could not have been
completed. The officers who were part of the team for varying periods included
Colonel S.S Patel, Colonel Jeevan Pathak, Major Vikas Kumar and Major Simi
Basheer. All of them worked diligently to collect the reference material from
various sources. The others who did a commendable work were Naib Subedar T.N.
Yadav, Naib Subedar Madan Singh, Havildar Fakir Chand. B. and Hav M.K. Biswas,
who did the data entry, scanned maps and photographs and photo copied
documents; Naib Subedar R.B. Singh, Havildar Mohan Rai and Signalman Amit Gawas
who made the diagrams and sketches; and Naik S. Mahmud, Lance Naik Sudheer
Kumar and Signalman N.R. Kene who performed runner duties and looked after the
administrative requirements of the team.
Date:
Major
General (Retired)
2 comments:
Could someone tell, as to when the Boys Regiment was formed in the Corps of Signals, Indian Army, and when closed for recruitment, why and when? How many of the alumni ( 3-year training) got their commission and the highest rank achieved at the time of retirement and longest service held by such Ex.Boys. Self an ex-boy OC 1962~65 batch. 6286018. P.K.Chandran. Shall be pleased to hear. With best regards. chandranpeechulli@gmail.com,91+7904972990 and 9445157728.
Postal Address:- Dr P.K.Chandran, PhD; F.I.E.(India), PgDLL, LLM Chartered Engineer & Lawyer.
I have read all the comments and suggestions posted by the visitors for this article are very fine,We will wait for your next article so only.Thanks
Rent a car for wedding in Rawalpindi
Post a Comment