RANK, APPOINTMENT & DESIGNATION
By
Maj Gen VK Singh
In recent years, there has
been a lot of debate on the correct manner of addressing officers of the Armed
Forces who have retired from service. Some recommend that the word ‘Retired’ or
abbreviation ‘Retd’ should be used after the rank e.g. Colonel (Retd) AB Singh.
Others feel that the correct method is to write ‘Retd’ after the name e.g.
Colonel AB Singh (Retd). Army HQ tried to remove the confusion and issued
a circular on 21 July 2021 clarifying that the latter option is correct, and
the name should be written as Colonel AB Singh (Retd). Unfortunately, this has
only confounded the confusion.
Army
officers are granted commissions that are signed personally by the President of
India. Under British rule, officers commissioned in the Indian Army before 1935
were known as Kings Commissioned Indian Officers (KCIOs). Their commissions
were signed by the King or Queen of England. Most of these officers were
granted commissions after undergoing training at Sandhurst or Woolwich in the
UK, except for a few like KM Cariappa who was trained at the Daly Cadet
College, Indore. After being commissioned, Army officers were earlier granted
the rank of Second Lieutenant. This rank has now been abolished in India and
officers are being commissioned in the rank of Lieutenant, which was earlier
granted after two years’ service as a Second Lieutenant. Thereafter
officers continue to get promotions until they retire or are released. The
highest rank in the Army is that of General, which is held by the Chief of Army
Staff. A few who are exceptionally deserving are promoted from General to Field
Marshal, who never retires. In India only two officers have reached the rank of
Field Marshal – KM Cariappa and SHFJ Manekshaw.
In
India, Army officers are entitled to retain their rank
even after retirement, as per privileges given under the Constitution which was
adopted in 1950, when India became a Republic. However, the practice of
military ranks being retained after retirement was in vogue earlier also under
British rule. This tradition is followed by most countries, including the UK
and the USA. The confusion about the manner of writing ranks after retirement
was not there in the initial years after Independence. Old timers will recall
that KCIOs such as Cariappa, Nathu Singh, Maharaj Rajendra Sinhji, Thimayya,
Thorat etc. did not use the word ‘retired’ after hanging their uniforms. I am
not sure when and why this practice started. Lately the word retired has been
replaced by veteran, following the custom in most countries. In fact, the Retired
Officers Identity Card issued to officers after retirement has now been
replaced by the Indian Army Veteran Card, which has the officer’s photograph in
uniform as well as civil dress. Since this card is also issued by Army HQ, I
wonder if there was a need for the circular issued on 21 July 2021.
According to article 18 of the
Constitution ‘No title, not being a military or academic
distinction, shall be conferred by the State’. Titles are used before names, in
formal correspondence as well as on invitation cards and during normal
conversation. Many professions carry titles, either by usage or as a
result of a professional or academic qualification. Medical practitioners
including dentists are universally referred to as doctors, as are those with
post graduate degrees such as Ph.D. Judges of the Supreme Court and High Court
also carry their titles, even after they retire, though this is from usage and
custom rather than any written rule. Similarly, many people who have held the
post of ambassador are now using this as a prefix, which is technically
incorrect. A person holds the appointment of ambassador in a foreign country
for a few years. It is not a title that should be used for life. In smaller
countries, the position if often held by a relatively junior member of the
Indian Foreign Service. Sometimes the appointment of ambassador is held
by a person who is not from the Indian Foreign Service. S Radhakrishnan, VK
Krishna Menon, MC Chagla, Karan Singh, Nani Palkiwala and General KM Cariappa
have held the appointments of Ambassador or High Commissioner. None of them was
from the Indian Foreign Service. And none of them used the prefix Ambassador
with their names.
As regards the All India Services such as the IAS and IPS, very few of them use
these abbreviations as a suffix after their names. Some use the designation or
last appointment held. So you may find names such as AB Singh, IAS; AB Singh,
DIG, or AB Singh, DG BSF and so on. These are all incorrect. The day an
IAS or IPS officer retires, he ceases to be a member of the service. Of course,
there is nothing wrong in mentioning his last appointment, e.g. former Cabinet
secretary; ex-DGP Haryana and so on. Again, it is a matter of individual choice
and if someone wants to add IAS or IPS after his name, it is for the particular
service or their association to take a call.
Coming back to the question of
Army ranks, my view is that it is a matter of personal choice.
Once an officer has retired, it is entirely up to him how he writes his name.
He can write only his name or his rank and name. Considering the ethos of the
Army and the pride most of us feel, no one would like to hide his rank. If he
prefers to write Retd or Veteran after his name, so be it. A name is a precious
possession and an heirloom given to us by our parents. The rank is sacrosanct
symbolising the nation’s trust. Nothing else is important.